Welcome to the Evidence Act 2008


This blog was started back when the Evidence Act 2008 was nothing more than a gleam in Parliament's eye. It was an attempt to further understanding of some challenging new legislation when information about it was difficult to find.

Since then, many authors and luminaries have turned their minds to the complex issues the Act obliges Victorian lawyers to engage with. A blog devoted exclusively to this one piece of legislation isn't necessary, and is impossible for us to give the attention it deserves.

If you're looking for a more conventional blog posting on topical legal issues, have a look at Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? by the same authors.

This site is no substitute for legal advice from an Australian lawyer. If you have a legal problem, it's great that you are doing a bit of research, but go consult a professional.




2009-07-12

189. The voir dire

189. The voir dire

(1) If the determination of a question whether-

(a) evidence should be admitted (whether in the exercise of a discretion or not); or

(b) evidence can be used against a person; or

(c) a witness is competent or compellable-

depends on the court finding that a particular fact exists, the question whether that fact exists is, for the purposes of this section, a preliminary question.

(2) If there is a jury, a preliminary question whether-

(a) particular evidence is evidence of an admission, or evidence to which section 138 (Discretion to exclude improperly or illegally obtained evidence) applies; or

(b) evidence of an admission, or evidence to which section 138 applies, should be admitted-

is to be heard and determined in the jury's absence.

(3) In the hearing of a preliminary question about whether a defendant's admission should be admitted into evidence (whether in the exercise of a discretion or not) in a criminal proceeding, the issue of the admission's truth or untruth is to be disregarded unless the issue is introduced by the defendant.

(4) If there is a jury, the jury is not to be present at a hearing to decide any other preliminary question unless the court so orders.

(5) Without limiting the matters that the court may take into account in deciding whether to make such an order, it is to take into account-

(a) whether the evidence to be adduced in the course of that hearing is likely to be prejudicial to the defendant; and

(b) whether the evidence concerned will be adduced in the course of the hearing to decide the preliminary question; and

(c) whether the evidence to be adduced in the course of that hearing would be admitted if adduced at another stage of the hearing (other than in another hearing to decide a preliminary question or, in a criminal proceeding, a hearing in relation to sentencing).

(6) Section 128(10) does not apply to a hearing to decide a preliminary question.

(7) In the application of Chapter 3 to a hearing to determine a preliminary question, the facts in issue are taken to include the fact to which the hearing relates.

(8) If a jury in a proceeding was not present at a hearing to determine a preliminary question, evidence is not to be adduced in the proceeding of evidence given by a witness at the hearing unless-

(a) it is inconsistent with other evidence given by the witness in the proceeding; or

(b) the witness has died.


Admission is defined in Part 1 of the Dictionary.

0 comments:

Related Articles


Related Article Widget by Hoctro

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP