Welcome to the Evidence Act 2008


This blog was started back when the Evidence Act 2008 was nothing more than a gleam in Parliament's eye. It was an attempt to further understanding of some challenging new legislation when information about it was difficult to find.

Since then, many authors and luminaries have turned their minds to the complex issues the Act obliges Victorian lawyers to engage with. A blog devoted exclusively to this one piece of legislation isn't necessary, and is impossible for us to give the attention it deserves.

If you're looking for a more conventional blog posting on topical legal issues, have a look at Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? by the same authors.

This site is no substitute for legal advice from an Australian lawyer. If you have a legal problem, it's great that you are doing a bit of research, but go consult a professional.




2009-07-12

Dictionary - Part 1 Definitions

Part 1 — Definitions

ACT court

Note

The Commonwealth Act includes a definition of this term.

admission means a previous representation that is—

(a) made by a person who is or becomes a party to a proceeding (including a defendant in a criminal proceeding); and

(b) adverse to the person's interest in the outcome of the proceeding;

asserted fact is defined in section 59;

associated defendant, in relation to a defendant in a criminal proceeding, means a person against whom a prosecution has been instituted, but not yet completed or terminated, for—

(a) an offence that arose in relation to the same events as those in relation to which the offence for which the defendant is being prosecuted arose; or

(b) an offence that relates to or is connected with the offence for which the defendant is being prosecuted;

Australia includes the external Territories;


Australian court means—

(a) the High Court; or
(b) a court exercising federal jurisdiction; or
(c) a court of a State or Territory; or
(d) a judge, justice or arbitrator under an Australian law; or
(e) a person or body authorised by an Australian law, or by consent of parties, to hear, receive and examine evidence; or
(f) a person or body that, in exercising a function under an Australian law, is required to apply the laws of evidence;

Australian law means a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;

Note

See clause 9 of Part 2 of this Dictionary for the meaning of law.
Australian lawyer has the meaning it has in the Legal Profession Act 2004;

Australian legal practitioner has the meaning it has in the Legal Profession Act 2004;

Australian or overseas proceeding means a proceeding (however described) in an Australian court or a foreign court;

Australian Parliament means the Parliament, the Parliament of the Commonwealth or another State or the Legislative Assembly of a Territory;

Australian practising certificate has the meaning it has in the Legal Profession Act 2004;

Australian-registered foreign lawyer has the meaning it has in the Legal Profession Act 2004;

Australian Statistician means the Australian Statistician referred to in section 5(2) of the Australian Bureau of Statistics Act 1975 of the Commonwealth, and includes any person to whom the powers of the Australian Statistician under section 12 of the Census and Statistics Act 1905 of the Commonwealth have been delegated;

business is defined in clause 1 of Part 2 of this Dictionary;

case of a party means the facts in issue in respect of which the party bears the legal burden of proof;

child means a child of any age and includes the meaning given in clause 10(1) of Part 2 of this Dictionary;

civil penalty is defined in clause 3 of Part 2 of this Dictionary;

civil proceeding means a proceeding other than a criminal proceeding;

client is defined in section 117;

coincidence evidence means evidence of a kind referred to in section 98(1) that a party seeks to have adduced for the purpose referred to in that subsection;

coincidence rule means section 98(1);

Commonwealth owned body corporate means a body corporate that, were the Commonwealth a body corporate, would, for the purposes of the Corporations Act 2001 of the Commonwealth, be—

(a) a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Commonwealth; or (b) a wholly-owned subsidiary of another body corporate that is, under this definition, a Commonwealth owned body corporate because of the application of paragraph (a) (including the application of that paragraph together with another application or other applications of this paragraph);

Commonwealth record means a record made by—

(a) a Department within the meaning of the Public Service Act 1999 of the Commonwealth; or

(b) the Parliament, a House of the Parliament, a committee of a House of the Parliament or a committee of the Parliament; or

(c) a person or body, other than a Legislative Assembly, holding office, or exercising power, under or because of the Commonwealth Constitution or a law of the Commonwealth; or

(d) a body or organisation other than a Legislative Assembly, whether incorporated or unincorporated, established for a public purpose—

(i) by or under a law of the Commonwealth or of a Territory (other than the Australian Capital Territory, the Northern Territory or Norfolk Island); or

(ii) by the Governor-General; or
(iii) by a Minister of the Commonwealth; or

(e) any other body or organisation that is a Commonwealth owned body corporate—

and kept or maintained by a person, body or organisation of a kind referred to in paragraph (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e), but does not include a record made by a person or body holding office, or exercising power, under or because of the Commonwealth Constitution or a law of the Commonwealth if the record was not made in connection with holding the office concerned, or exercising the power concerned;

confidential communication is defined in section 117;

confidential document is defined in section 117;

court means Victorian court;

Notes

1. Victorian court is defined in this Dictionary.

2. The Commonwealth Act does not include this definition.

credibility of a person who has made a representation that has been admitted in evidence means the credibility of the representation, and includes the person's ability to observe or remember facts and events about which the person made the representation;

credibility of a witness means the credibility of any part or all of the evidence of the witness, and includes the witness's ability to observe or remember facts and events about which the witness has given, is giving or is to give evidence;

credibility evidence is defined in section 101A;

credibility rule means section 102;

criminal proceeding means a prosecution for an offence and includes—

(a)a proceeding for the committal of a person for trial or sentence for an offence; a

(b)a proceeding relating to bail—

but does not include a prosecution for an offence that is a prescribed taxation offence within the meaning of Part III of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 of the Commonwealth;

cross-examination is defined in clause 2(2) of Part 2 of this Dictionary;

cross-examiner means a party who is cross-examining a witness;

de facto partner is defined in clause 11 of Part 2 of this Dictionary;

document means any record of information, and includes—

(a) anything on which there is writing; or
(b) anything on which there are marks, figures, symbols or perforations having a meaning for persons qualified to interpret them; or
(c) anything from which sounds, images or writings can be reproduced with or without the aid of anything else; or
(d) a map, plan, drawing or photograph;

Note

See also clause 8 of Part 2 of this Dictionary on the meaning of document.

electronic communication has the same meaning as it has in the Electronic Transactions (Victoria) Act 2000;

examination in chief is defined in clause 2(1) of Part 2 of this Dictionary;

exercise of a function includes performance of a duty;

fax, in relation to a document, means a copy of the document that has been reproduced by facsimile telegraphy;

Note

The Commonwealth Act includes a definition of this term.

foreign court means any court (including any person or body authorised to take or receive evidence, whether on behalf of a court or otherwise and whether or not the person or body is empowered to require the answering of questions or the production of documents) of a foreign country or a part of such a country;

function includes power, authority or duty;

government or official gazette includes the Government Gazette;

Note

The definition of this term in the Commonwealth Act and New South Wales Act differs from this definition.

Governor of a State includes any person for the time being administering the Government of the State;

Governor-General means Governor-General of the Commonwealth and includes any person for the time being administering the Government of the Commonwealth;

Note

The Commonwealth Act does not include definitions of Governor of a State and Governor-General. These definitions are covered by sections 16A and 16B of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 of the Commonwealth.

hearsay rule means section 59(1);

identification evidence means evidence that is—

(a) an assertion by a person to the effect that a defendant was, or resembles (visually, aurally or otherwise) a person who was, present at or near a place where—
(i) the offence for which the defendant is being prosecuted was committed; or
(ii) an act connected to that offence was done—

at or about the time at which the offence was committed or the act was done, being an assertion that is based wholly or partly on what the person making the assertion saw, heard or otherwise perceived at that place and time; or

(b) a report (whether oral or in writing) of such an assertion;

investigating official means—

(a) a police officer (other than a police officer who is engaged in covert investigations under the orders of a superior); or

(b) a person appointed by or under an Australian law (other than a person who is engaged in covert investigations under the orders of a superior) whose functions include functions in respect of the prevention or investigation of offences;

joint sitting means—

(a) in relation to the Parliament of the Commonwealth—a joint sitting of the members of the Senate and of the House of Representatives convened by the Governor-General under section 57 of the Commonwealth Constitution or convened under any Act of the Commonwealth; or

(b) in relation to a bicameral legislature of a State—a joint sitting of both Houses of the legislature convened under a law of the State;

judge, in relation to a proceeding, means the judge, magistrate or other person before whom the proceeding is being held;

law is defined in clause 9 of Part 2 of this Dictionary;

leading question means a question asked of a witness that—

(a)directly or indirectly suggests a particular answer to the question; or

(b)assumes the existence of a fact the existence of which is in dispute in the proceeding and as to the existence of which the witness has not given evidence before the question is asked;

legal counsel means an Australian lawyer employed in or by a government agency or other body who by law is exempted from holding an Australian practising certificate, or who does not require an Australian practising certificate, to engage in legal practice in the course of that employment;

Note

Examples of legal counsel are in-house counsel and government solicitors.

Legislative Assembly means any present or former Legislative Assembly of a Territory, and includes the Australian Capital Territory House of Assembly;

member of the Australian Federal Police includes a special member or a staff member of the Australian Federal Police;

NSW court

Note

The New South Wales Act includes this definition.

offence means an offence against or arising under an Australian law;
opinion rule means section 76;

overseas-registered foreign lawyer has the meaning it has in Part 2.8 of the Legal Profession Act 2004;

parent includes the meaning given in clause 10(2) of Part 2 of this Dictionary;

picture identification evidence is defined in section 115;

police officer means—

(a) a member of the Australian Federal Police; or

(b) a member of the police force of a State or Territory;

postal article has the same meaning as in the Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989 of the Commonwealth;

previous representation means a representation made otherwise than in the course of giving evidence in the proceeding in which evidence of the representation is sought to be adduced;

prior consistent statement of a witness means a previous representation that is consistent with evidence given by the witness;

prior inconsistent statement of a witness means a previous representation that is inconsistent with evidence given by the witness;

probative value of evidence means the extent to which the evidence could rationally affect the assessment of the probability of the existence of a fact in issue;

prosecutor means a person who institutes or is responsible for the conduct of a prosecution;

public document means a document that—

(a) forms part of the records of the Crown in any of its capacities; or

(b) forms part of the records of the government of a foreign country; or

(c) forms part of the records of a person or body holding office or exercising a function under or because of the Commonwealth Constitution, an Australian law or a law of a foreign country; or

(d) is being kept by or on behalf of the Crown, such a government or such a person or body—

and includes the records of the proceedings of, and papers presented to—

(e) an Australian Parliament, a House of an Australian Parliament, a committee of such a House or a committee of an Australian Parliament; and

(f) a legislature of a foreign country, including a House or committee (however described) of such a legislature;

re-examination is defined in clause 2(3) and (4) of Part 2 of this Dictionary;

representation includes—

(a) an express or implied representation (whether oral or in writing); or

(b) a representation to be inferred from conduct; or

(c) a representation not intended by its maker to be communicated to or seen by another person; or

(d) a representation that for any reason is not communicated; seal includes a stamp;

tendency evidence means evidence of a kind referred to in section 971) that a party seeks to have adduced for the purpose referred to in that subsection;

tendency rule means section 97(1);

traditional laws and customs of an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander group (including a kinship group) includes any of the traditions, customary laws, customs, observances, practices, knowledge and beliefs of the group;

Victorian court means—

(a) the Supreme Court; or

(b) any other court created by Parliament—

and includes any person or body (other than a court) that, in exercising a function under the law of the State, is required to apply the laws of eevidence;

Note

The Commonwealth Act and New South Wales Act do not include this definition.

visual identification evidence is defined in section 114;

witness includes the meaning given in clause 7 of Part 2 of this Dictionary.

Read more...
2009-07-08

101. Further restrictions on tendency evidence and coincidence evidence adduced by prosecution

101. Further restrictions on tendency evidence and coincidence evidence adduced by prosecution

(1) This section only applies in a criminal proceeding and so applies in addition to sections 97 and 98.

(2) Tendency evidence about a defendant, or coincidence evidence about a defendant, that is adduced by the prosecution cannot be used against the defendant unless the probative value of the evidence substantially outweighs any prejudicial effect it may have on the defendant.

(3) This section does not apply to tendency evidence that the prosecution adduces to explain or contradict tendency evidence adduced by the defendant.

(4) This section does not apply to coincidence evidence that the prosecution adduces to explain or contradict coincidence evidence adduced by the defendant.


The term coincidence evidence is defined in Part 1 of the Dictionary.

Read more...

98. The coincidence rule

98. The coincidence rule

(1) Evidence that 2 or more events occurred is not admissible to prove that a person did a particular act or had a particular state of mind on the basis that, having regard to any similarities in the events or the circumstances in which they occurred, or any similarities in both the events and the circumstances in which they occurred, it is improbable that the events occurred coincidentally unless-

(a) the party seeking to adduce the evidence gave reasonable notice in writing to each other party of the party's intention to adduce the evidence; and

(b) the court thinks that the evidence will, either by itself or having regard to other evidence adduced or to be adduced by the party seeking to adduce the evidence, have significant probative value.

Note

One of the events referred to in subsection (1) may be an event the occurrence of which is a fact in issue in the proceeding.

(2) Subsection (1)(a) does not apply if-

(a) the evidence is adduced in accordance with any directions made by the court under section 100; or

(b) the evidence is adduced to explain or contradict coincidence evidence adduced by another party.

Note

Other provisions of this Act, or of other laws, may operate as exceptions to the coincidence rule.


The touchstone of admissibility under s 98(1) is similarity: PNJ v DPP [2010] VSCA 88 [at 8]. In CGL v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] VSCA 26 (in which the same issue arose on an interlocutory appeal) the prosecution conceded that the correct approach to assessing the probative significance of asserted similarities was to be found in the judgment of Winneke P in R v Papamitrou (2004) VR 375 (a pre-Evidence Act decision). In PNG v DPP, Maxwell P, Buchanan and Bongiorno JJA said [at 19 and 20],

19 It is, in our view, a mistake to treat as relevant similarities for this purpose features of the alleged offending which reflect circumstances outside the accused’s control. In this case, a number of the asserted similarities simply reflected the setting in which the offending occurred. Each of the complainants was detained in the Centre. The limited age range of those eligible for such detention accounts for the similarity in ages, as counsel for the applicant pointed out. Likewise, the location of the alleged offending – either in the bedroom of the complainant or in the applicant’s bedroom – reflected the custodial setting. The present case is quite different from that dealt with by Winneke P in Papamitrou, where the accused was able to choose the various locations for the individual sexual acts, and used ‘pretexts to isolate the girls from the company of others ...’.

20 To qualify as a relevant similarity in circumstances such as these, there must be something distinctive about the way in which the accused allegedly took advantage of the setting or context. In the present case, senior counsel for the Crown did not seek to identify any such distinctive behaviour, and we were not persuaded that there was any.


The use of a table drawn up by the Crown for assessing the asserted similarities was commended.

The Court of Appeal affirmed that enquiry into the possibility of 'contamination' (concoction between apparently unconnected complainants) is a necessary part of determining if evidence has significant probative value under s 98(1)(b), following AE v R [2008] NSWCCA 52 [at 44].

The identically-composed Court of Appeal had laid out [at 22] the steps it used for the assessment of coincidence evidence in CGL v DPP [2010] VSCA 26:

22 Accordingly, the questions to be addressed in relation to coincidence evidence are as follows:

1. Are the similarities in the specified events and/or in the circumstances in which they occurred such that it is improbable that the events occurred coincidentally?

2. If so, would the evidence of those events and circumstances tend to prove that the accused:

(a) did the specified act; or

(b) had the specified state of mind


where doing that act or having that state of mind is a fact in issue or is relevant to a fact in issue?

3. If so, does the evidence have significant probative value, either by itself or having regard to other evidence adduced or ought to be adduced by the prosecution?

4. If so, does the probative value of the evidence substantially outweigh any prejudicial effect it may have on the accused?

Read more...

96. Failure to act

96. Failure to act

A reference in this Part to doing an act includes a reference to failing to do that act.

Read more...

94. Application

94. Application

(1) This Part does not apply to evidence that relates only to the credibility of a witness.

(2) This Part does not apply so far as a proceeding relates to bail or sentencing.

(3) This Part does not apply to evidence of-

(a) the character, reputation or conduct of a person; or

(b) a tendency that a person has or had-

if that character, reputation, conduct or tendency is a fact in issue.

Read more...
Related Articles


Related Article Widget by Hoctro

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP